Published March, 2012
By Reece Walters
Publisher: Taylor & Francis (Routledge Cavendish)
Rating:
in-stock

This book aims to bring the debates about GM food into the social and criminological arena. It highlights the criminal actions of state and corporate officials including the illegal production and sale of GM products, biopiracy and the manipulatio

---

Published October, 2011
By Mark Henaghan
Publisher: Taylor & Francis (Routledge Cavendish)
Rating:
in-stock

Over the years, there has been a shift in medical law and practise to distrust the judgement of health professionals. This book looks comparatively at a number of countries, showing through analysis of case law, legislation and protocols produced by hospitals, how the shift from trust to lack of trust has happened.

---

Published October, 2011
By Mark Henaghan
Publisher: Taylor & Francis (Routledge Cavendish)
Rating:
in-stock

Over the years, there has been a shift in medical law and practise to distrust the judgement of health professionals. This book looks comparatively at a number of countries, showing through analysis of case law, legislation and protocols produced by hospitals, how the shift from trust to lack of trust has happened.

---

Published May, 2011
By John Carrier, Ian Kendall, David Downes and Paul Rock
Publisher: Taylor & Francis (Routledge Cavendish)
Rating:
in-stock

Reviewing healthcare policy in the NHS, this book locates the NHS in the context of the welfare state. It is suitable for a wide range of undergraduate and postgraduate students studying health policy and the NHS.

---

Published November, 2009
By Samantha Halliday
Publisher: Taylor & Francis (Routledge Cavendish)
Rating:
in-stock

Explores a number of issues relating to reproduction. Critically analyzing medical ethics and the law in a variety of jurisdictions, this book makes suggestions on reforming the law in the UK. It looks at the relationship between the law and medical ethics in a number of jurisdictions, including Germany, US, France, and the Republic of Ireland.

---

Published October, 2009
By Hazel Biggs
Publisher: Taylor & Francis (Routledge Cavendish)
Rating:
in-stock

Suitable for members of research ethics committees (RECs), professionals involved with medical research and those with an academic interest in the subject, this book explains the relationship between law and ethics in the context of medically related research.

---

Published April, 2009
By Alastair V. Campbell
Publisher: Taylor & Francis (Routledge Cavendish)
Rating:
in-stock

Addresses a number of key questions including: Should it be legal to sell human organs for transplantation? Are public displays of plastinated bodies or public autopsies morally justifiable? And, should there be restrictions on the uses of human tissue in teaching and research?

---

Published April, 2009
By Alastair V. Campbell
Publisher: Taylor & Francis (Routledge Cavendish)
Rating:
in-stock

Debates about uses and abuses of the human body in medicine have highlighted the need for a thorough discussion of the ethics of the uses of bodies, both living and dead. This volume explores different views of the significance of the human body. It provides useful background to different controversies in medical ethics.

---

Published April, 2008
By J.K. Mason and Graeme Laurie
Publisher: Taylor & Francis (Routledge Cavendish)
Rating:
in-stock

The underlying rationale of medical law has undergone radical shifts in the brief lifespan of the discipline. This work takes a look at the phenomenon and impact of patient autonomy in medical law and offers an alternative perspective on the nature of the discipline by examining the complex interface between patients' rights and public interest.

---

Published April, 2008
By J.K. Mason and Graeme Laurie
Publisher: Taylor & Francis (Routledge Cavendish)
Rating:
in-stock

The underlying rationale of medical law has undergone radical shifts in the brief lifespan of the discipline. This work takes a look at the phenomenon and impact of patient autonomy in medical law and offers an alternative perspective on the nature of the discipline by examining the complex interface between patients' rights and public interest.

---